Monday, February 15
Monday, November 9
South Asian Education and Development: Rooted in Histories
Now, I debate with myself over Nicholas Kristof and the sincerity and authenticity of this work. This article was one of disappointment.
I can agree with Kristof’s overall point: a message to the US government to stop bombing countries and start to develop them by providing schools. This is one of the best ways to bring recurring, deep change. He brought up Greg Mortenson, a humanitarian I have mentioned before who has pioneered building schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan with his bare hands (not an expression, actually true.) Kristof noted that these schools are secular and are not being threatened and are welcomed by the community. Rich Islamic extremists are building schools that teach solely radical Islam, which end up being the only outlet for poor families to give their children an education. If extremists are investing in the youth to spread a particular message, can’t we start to invest in schools to spread a more secular message?

Then Kristof compared Pakistan with Bangladesh. First off, not a good idea. The two nations may have been one 50 years back but that in no means allows for a comparison: the Pakistan of 1947-1971 was forced by the British, nations separated by their enemy, India, speaking separate languages with differing cultures and economies. These differences lead to the Liberation War making Bangladesh it's own country. Pakistan is to Bangladesh as the US is to Nicaragua. To this day I don’t know how India survives with it’s own diversity.
Kristof makes the comparison that Bangladesh focused on education since becoming it’s own nation in a way that Pakistan never did. But Bangladesh received more help than Pakistan. Bangladesh was the poster-child of a desperate nation so much so that George Harrison along with Ravi Shankar held a concert in New York in 1971 to send money through UNICEF. No one did that for Pakistan. Also, Bangladesh has become the ‘development capital of the world’—education not the only focus but providing medical, social and environmental services. Education will do nothing if the current surrounding society isn’t improved. Kristof then claimed that, “Bangladesh now has more girls in high school than boys.”
At first I wondered how accurate of a statistic this is (it was not referenced). Looking at UNICEF, it seems that Bangladesh is a forerunner in achieving equality of gender enrollment in schools. Enrollment is one thing; attendance and continuing education are another--25% of Bangladeshi girls don't actually finish their primary school education according to UNESCO 2007. Kristof then says that “those Bangladeshi women joined the labor force, laying the foundation for a garment industry…” Educated women do not go into the garment industry. This industry is one of mostly unskilled labor for the most part so much so that children can work there.

The next day, I mentioned the article to an amazing friend; his father is Burmese, and his mother Persian, they met in Chittagong, Bangladesh then moved to New Jersey. He speaks English, Bangla, Urdu and local Chittagong language. He agreed, and shared some of his insight by mentioning how Bangladesh is very homogeneous: everyone speaks the same language (though dialects) and it is a very small country where it is easy to travel (via river or over the land which is mostly flat). Also add into the fact that Bangladesh fought for their country: an instant camaraderie existed as all Bangladeshis fought behind Bangabadhu for their language and culture. It was their choice and their families and neighbors as one.
Pakistan, even Afghanistan, are quite heterogeneous where communication between tribes is difficult over endless hills, too much desert and a myriad of languages. Perhaps now Afghanistan and Pakistan are uniting in their own countries—but at the rate we’re going it’s going to be in hatred against us.
While I support Kristof’s, I urge him not to compare too much two different societies. Of course, use one as an example but take into account the different histories that lead to the differences that exist today.
Tuesday, November 3
With Privilege Comes Responsibility: The Case of Corrupt Governments
Saturday, September 12
Nari Khomotaeon
This entry is long overdue but I had difficulty deciding what to say. The title of this entry in Bangla means “women empowerment.” It’s a topic often forgotten, usually lost and sometimes thought unnecessary and discriminatory. It is too deep a topic to dive into for one journal entry – but it is my life’s work. It is still an issue in every country, including America – but for now I will focus on Bangladesh.
- On the Gender Development Index, Bangladesh was ranked 120 out of 154 in 2007
- BD is one of the top ranked countries that seclude and restrict its women (HRW)
- The average age of marriage is younger 20 years, most likely not by choice but by parents, mainly father’s, choice ( )
- 50% of women have said they have experienced physical abuse by male partner. In 2002, 68% of Bangladesh women never spoke to family or officials about their abuse (WHO, HRW, AI) Only about 4,100 rapes are reported each year – this might be due to the silencing of women, as well as the fact that there is no law acknowledging marital rape. (WHO, UNIFEM)
- Honor killings regularly occur, and 50% of all murders in Bangladesh are of women by their husbands (US Dept of Justice, HRW)
- Because sons are still strongly preferred than daughters, 1.6 million girls are missing (missing means that by average, there would be more daughters in families if this discrimination didn’t exist. Instead, they are missing, meaning killed, aborted, sold or not given proper medical attention or food.) (UN, US Census Bureau)
- 85% of assembly line workers are women. Factories demand unskilled labor at miniscule salaries – girls are less likely to have an education so they provide the unskilled labor for little pay.
- More than 25% of young girls don’t finish their primary school education compared to the 10% of boys. In universities, only about 35% of students are female. And only 15% of primary school teachers are women. 59% of women are illiterate compared to men’s 46% (UNESCO)
- Less than 5% of land owners are women due to widespread discrimination against women inheriting, owning or controlling property (ICRW)
Depressed enough? Hold your hats, I haven’t even dove into the stats of trafficking yet. But we’ll wait on that for another day.
In my two months here, I have met some amazing women. When selling Iftar on the street, no exaggeration, 99% of the customers were men. One women came to the table with a private car and beautiful purple sari. Striking a conversation with her, she revealed to me that she had three jobs: professor of psychology at Dhaka University, private practice in psychology, and a writer for a children’s television program (the Bangla version of Sesame Street!). I went to a lecture on Gender and Development at Dhaka University, the lecturer standing up there, confident and proud, arguing in favor of positive discrimination to a room full of men, with her daughter sitting on the side because no one was home to watch her. Enormous strides have been made in women’s rights, including the passing of an act to reserve seats for women in Parliament, more women are attending school and working alongside their husbands. Even one man proudly said, "Women can drive now!"
But, I have yet to see a woman driving here. Laws are changing, but cultural practices are deeply embedded and are slow moving. Empowerment is defined has the ability to make a choice, controlling life decisions and claiming rights. By law, women are claiming more rights, but on the street and in the villages, too many social pressures exist that keep women inside, silenced and devalued. Often, law enforcement official do not value or practice these laws.
But I will share one story that gave me hope: at the lecture on Gender and Development, the woman lecturer was stating that positive discrimination was needed to raise women to the power level of men. One example is on the crowded streets and buses that should reserve seats for women because men push women out of the way to get on the bus, and if she gets onto the bus, she is likely to be touched. One man argued against this, saying, "Of course on a crowded bus you will be accidently bumped. There's no need for special treatment."
Across the conference table, one of the 7 women in the room, wearing an hijab and quiet most of the night, leaned across the table and said, "I know the different between an accidental bump and a hand down my dress."
He shut up.
Women are speaking up. Voice is the first step towards empowerment: vocalizing your situation, hearing stories to organize and create real change. Just because Bangladesh has a woman Prime Minister, doesn't mean that governmental and structural changes reach the women who need it. These cultural changes have to start with the women themselves.
